圣经中的传统

主题一|圣经中“传统”相关词汇的原文范围

(耶利米书10:2-3)“主如此说:你们不要效法列国的行为,也不要为天象惊惶,因列国为此事惊惶。众民的【风俗】是虚空的;他们在树林中用斧子砍伐一棵树,匠人用手工造成偶像。”

【风俗】原文:חֻקּוֹת(ḥuqqôṯ)字根:חָקַק(ḥāqaq「刻下、雕刻、规定」)基本含义:「律例、规条、固定制度」

这词本身并不一定是负面。同一个字根,也大量用于神的律例与典章,例如 :

(出埃及记12:14)“你们要记念这日,守为主的节,作为你们世世代代永远的定例。”

例子:

【定例】原文:חֻקָּה(ḥuqqāh)

(诗篇119:5)“但愿我行事坚定,得以遵守祢的律例。”

【律例】原文:חֻקֶּיךָ(ḥuqqêḵā)


(马可福音7:6-13)“耶稣说:‘以赛亚指着你们假冒为善之人所说的预言是不错的。如经上说:这百姓用嘴唇尊敬我,心却远离我。他们将人的吩咐当作道理教导人,所以拜我也是枉然。你们是离弃神的诫命,拘守人的【遗传】。’又说:‘你们诚然是废弃神的诫命,要守自己的【遗传】。摩西说:“当孝敬父母”;又说:“咒骂父母的,必治死他。”你们倒说,人若对父母说:“我所当奉给你的,已经作了各耳板(各耳板就是供献的意思)”,以后你们就不容他再奉养父母。这就是你们承接【遗传】,废了神的道。你们还做许多这样的事。’”

【遗传】原文:παράδοσις(paradosis)字根:παραδίδωμι(paradidōmi「交付、传递」)基本含义:「传承下来的事物、传统、遗传教训」

这词本身同样不一定是负面。因为同一个词,也用于使徒教训的传承。

例子:

(帖撒罗尼迦后书2:15)“所以弟兄们,你们要站立得稳,凡所领受的教训,不拘是我们口传的,是信上写的,都要坚守。”

【口传】原文:παραδόσεις(paradoseis)

(哥林多前书11:2)“我称赞你们,因你们凡事记念我,又坚守我所传给你们的。”

【所传给】原文:παρέδωκα(paredōka)


(歌罗西书2:8)“你们要谨慎,恐怕有人用他的【理学】和虚空的妄言,不照着基督,乃照人间的【遗传】和世上的小学,就把你们掳去。”

【理学】原文:φιλοσοφία(philosophia)字根:φιλέω(phileō「爱」)+σοφία(sophia「智慧」)基本含义:「爱智慧」

这词本身同样不一定是负面。因为“智慧”在圣经中很多时候属于正面词汇。

例子:

(箴言4:7)“智慧为首;所以要得智慧。在你一切所得之内必得聪明。”

【智慧】原文:חָכְמָה(ḥoḵmāh)

(雅各书1:5)“你们中间若有缺少智慧的,应当求那厚赐与众人、也不斥责人的神,主就必赐给他。”

【智慧】原文:σοφίας(sophias)


结论

传统作为一种“被传递下来”的事物,其原文词汇本身并不一定用于负面意义。无论是旧约中的【风俗】חֻקּוֹת(ḥuqqôṯ),还是新约中的【遗传】παράδοσις(paradosis),甚至【理学】φιλοσοφία(philosophia),这些词本身都可以用于正面用途。

因此,这些基础经文所抵挡的,并不是“传承”本身,而是——传承“什么”。

问题不在于“制度”本身,而在于是什么制度;
不在于“智慧”本身,而在于是什么智慧;
不在于“传统”本身,而在于传统是否取代了神的话。

因为圣经中:

  • 神也设立律例;
  • 使徒也传承教训;
  • 圣经也强调真正属神的智慧;

然而,当人的传统、文化、宗教制度、哲学思想,高过神的启示时,传统就不再只是“传承”,而会开始成为遮盖真理、废掉神命令的系统。

因此,从圣经的角度来看,问题的核心不在“传承”本身,而在于——所传承的内容,是否偏离了神的道。

总结一句:

圣经所抵挡的,不是“传承”本身,而是——那些高过神真理、甚至取代神之道的传承。


主题二|不可回到“埃及的路”——世界文化与属灵系统进入教会的问题

(申命记17:16)“只是王不可为自己加添马匹,也不可使百姓回埃及去,为要加添他的马匹,因主曾吩咐你们说:‘不可再回那条路去。’”

这里的重点,不只是地理上的“埃及”,而是——回到旧有世界系统的道路。在圣经里,“埃及”长期象征:

  • 属世权势
  • 情欲和最的体系
  • 奴役之地
  • 放纵文化
  • 虚伪的生活模式

因此,“不可再回那条路去”,不只是离开一个国家,而是不可重新回到属世价值与属世体系之中。

对应章节:

  • (出埃及记13:3)“因为主用大能的手将你们从这地方领出来;有酵的饼都不可吃。”
  • (利未记18:3)“你们从前住的埃及地,那里人的行为,你们不可效法。”
  • (耶利米书10:2)“你们不要效法列国的行为。”

⚠️圣经一直强调:神的百姓被分别出来之后,不可重新回到世界的模式。

(歌罗西书2:8)“你们要谨慎,恐怕有人用他的理学和虚空的妄言,不照着基督,乃照人间的遗传和世上的小学,就把你们掳去。”

【虚空的妄言】原文:κενῆς ἀπάτης(kenēs apatēs)κενός(kenos):「空的、没有实际内容的」ἀπάτη(apatē):「欺骗、迷惑」

基本含义:“外表有吸引力,里面却空虚并带着迷惑性的东西。”

【世上的小学】原文:στοιχεῖα τοῦ κόσμου(stoicheia tou kosmou)στοιχεῖα(stoicheia)

基本含义:

  • 基础知识
  • 世界体系
  • 初级原则
  • 世界运行结构

这词后来延伸成:“世界性的思想架构与属世运作系统”。

因此,保罗这里不是单单在谈“学问”,而是在警告:

那些看似有文化、有智慧、有吸引力、有感官刺激、有群体感染力的,但如果没有超越世界,依然在世界系统运作,不仅没有办法带领人到达属天的领域,还会使人倒退。

为什么这会延伸到:

  • Punk文化、Disco文化、夜店式敬拜、世界娱乐模式、宗教庆典化、情绪煽动文化等

因为这些系统,本质上很多来自:

  • 属世释放
  • 肉体刺激
  • 感官中心
  • 群体情绪推动
  • 世界身份认同

而不是:

  • 悔改
  • 圣洁
  • 敬畏
  • 真理
  • 十字架
  • 分别为圣
  • 圣灵的果子

(加拉太书5:22-23)“圣灵所结的果子,就是仁爱、喜乐、和平、忍耐、恩慈、良善、信实、温柔、节制。这样的事,没有律法禁止。”

圣灵的工作,虽然包含喜乐,但这种喜乐并不是:“肉体释放、情绪失控、群体煽动、感官刺激放纵气氛”

而是带着:节制、温柔、圣洁、次序、真理

因此,圣经中的属灵喜乐,与世界文化中的狂欢释放,本质上并不相同。

  • (彼得前书1:15-16)“那召你们的既是圣洁,你们在一切所行的事上也要圣洁。因为经上记着说:‘你们要圣洁,因为我是圣洁的。’”
  • (以弗所书5:18-19)“不要醉酒,酒能使人放荡;乃要被圣灵充满。当用诗章、颂词、灵歌彼此对说,口唱心和地赞美主。”

这里同样形成强烈对比:不是放荡式释放,而是被圣灵管理;不是属世狂欢,而是属灵敬拜。


结论:

属世的风俗、文化与习惯,若与圣灵的果子所描绘的生命方向不同,那么即便披上“敬拜”的名称,也会开始失去教会原本属灵的目的。

(加拉太书5:22-23)“圣灵所结的果子,就是仁爱、喜乐、和平、忍耐、恩慈、良善、信实、温柔、节制。”

因此,教会真正的问题,不只是“有没有音乐”,而是:

这种文化是否彰显圣灵的果子?

若一种敬拜文化:

  • 以情绪释放为核心,
  • 以感官刺激为吸引,
  • 以群体气氛为推动,
  • 以狂欢效果为目标,

那么它就必须被圣经检验。

因为:

Rock式的狂热文化,如何谈得上“温柔”?
尖叫、混乱、情绪失控,如何谈得上“节制”?
演唱会式的气氛,如何谈得上“敬畏”与“圣洁”?
若最终人的焦点变成气氛、感觉、刺激与现场感染力,那么十字架、悔改与真理,就容易被边缘化。

  • (哥林多前书14:33)“因为神不是叫人混乱,乃是叫人安静。”
  • (哥林多前书14:40)“凡事都要规规矩矩地按着次序行。”
  • (彼得前书1:15)“那召你们的既是圣洁,你们在一切所行的事上也要圣洁。”

因此,圣经并不是反对喜乐,也不是反对音乐,而是强调:

真正出于圣灵的敬拜,一定不会离开圣灵果子。

关键结论:

(马太福音7:16-20)“凭着他们的果子,就可以认出他们来。荆棘上岂能摘葡萄呢?蒺藜里岂能摘无花果呢?这样,凡好树都结好果子,惟独坏树结坏果子。好树不能结坏果子;坏树不能结好果子。凡不结好果子的树,就砍下来丢在火里。所以,凭着他们的果子,就可以认出他们来。”

本节在说的难道不是圣灵的果子吗?


 

Holy Communion

Why Observe the Lord’s Supper

Introduction

Why should we observe the Lord’s Supper? This question does not arise from human need, but from God’s revelation and command.

The institution of the Lord’s Supper is not a product of historical development within the church, but an act personally established by Christ. On the night He was betrayed, He clearly said to His disciples: “Do this in remembrance of Me” (Luke 22:19; 1 Corinthians 11:23–25). This is not a suggestion, but a command, indicating that the Lord’s Supper is a spiritual practice that God requires the church to continue observing.

However, the meaning of the Lord’s Supper goes beyond this. If it is understood only from a New Testament perspective, its deeper foundation can easily be overlooked. The Scripture clearly states: “For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed” (1 Corinthians 5:7), showing that the work of Christ is the fulfillment of the Old Testament Passover.

Therefore, the Lord’s Supper is not an isolated ritual, but a crucial act that carries forward the Old Testament into the New Testament. In the Old Testament, the Passover lamb’s blood spared people from judgment; in the New Testament, Christ becomes the true Lamb, accomplishing redemption, and the Lord’s Supper is the means by which believers enter into this fulfillment.

This reveals an important principle:
The Lord’s Supper is not only an act of remembrance, but also a key expression of the transition in redemptive history from shadow to reality.

Conclusion

The Lord’s Supper is a command personally instituted by Christ, the fulfillment of the Passover in Him, and an essential act through which believers enter into the reality of redemption.

Key Scriptures:

(Luke 22:19–20) “And He took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, ‘This is My body given for you; do this in remembrance of Me.’ In the same way, after supper He took the cup, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you.’”

(1 Corinthians 11:23–25) “For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night He was betrayed, took bread, and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, ‘This is My body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of Me.’ In the same way, after supper He took the cup, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in My blood; whenever you drink it, do this in remembrance of Me.’”

(1 Corinthians 5:7) “Get rid of the old yeast so that you may be a new unleavened batch—as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.”


The Original Meaning of the Lord’s Supper

⚠️ In the New Testament, there is no single specific term that directly corresponds to “the Lord’s Supper.” The concept is expressed through multiple terms in different contexts. “The Lord’s Supper” is a theological designation formed later in church history, not a term explicitly used in the original New Testament text.

The Origin of the Term “Lord’s Supper” (Traditional Church Usage)

In church history, two main terms are commonly used:

1. ΕΥ̓ΧΑΡΙΣΤΊΑ (EUCHARISTIA)

This is one of the most common names for the Lord’s Supper, meaning “thanksgiving” or “gratitude.”
It comes from the verb εὐχαριστέω (eucharisteō), meaning “to give thanks.”

Scriptural basis: When the Lord instituted the Supper, He “gave thanks”

(Luke 22:19):
“And He took bread, gave thanks, broke it, and gave it to them, saying: This is My body given for you; do this in remembrance of Me.”

[Give thanks] Original: εὐχαριστήσας (eucharistēsas); Root: εὐ (eu “good”) + χάρις (charis “grace”); Basic meaning: “to give thanks, to express gratitude.”

2. ΚΟΙΝΩΝΊΑ (KOINŌNIA)

Meaning “fellowship, sharing, participation, union.”

Scriptural basis:

(1 Corinthians 10:16)
“The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ?”

[Participation] Original: κοινωνία (koinōnia); Root: κοινός (koinos “common, shared”); Basic meaning: “sharing, participation, fellowship.”

3. ΔΕΙ͂ΠΝΟΝ (DEIPNON, banquet/meal)

Scriptural basis:

(1 Corinthians 11:20)
“When you come together, it is not the Lord’s Supper you eat.”

Original focus: The Lord’s Supper is called “the Lord’s meal,” indicating that its nature is a spiritual banquet, emphasizing fellowship with the Lord.

⚠️ Important note:

[Supper/meal] Original: δεῖπνον (deipnon); Root: δειπ- (deip- “to eat, to dine”); Basic meaning: “a meal, banquet.”

In Greek culture, δεῖπνον refers to the main meal of the day, often with social and communal significance. The word itself does not emphasize “evening time,” but rather the idea of the “principal meal.” Therefore, translating it as “supper” (evening meal) reflects cultural habit, not the inherent meaning of the word.

Why it is often translated as “supper”:
In ancient Greek and Jewish culture, the main meal was typically eaten after the day’s work.

Key point: δεῖπνον emphasizes the nature of a principal meal or banquet, not the time of evening. The translation “supper” is culturally based, not linguistically required.

4. ἈΝΆΜΝΗΣΙΣ (ANAMNESIS, remembrance)

Scriptural basis:

(Luke 22:19)
“And He took bread, gave thanks, broke it, and gave it to them, saying: This is My body given for you; do this in remembrance of Me.

(1 Corinthians 11:24–25)
“And when He had given thanks, He broke it and said: This is My body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of Me. In the same way, after supper He took the cup, saying: This cup is the new covenant in My blood; whenever you drink it, do this in remembrance of Me.”

Original emphasis: “Remembrance” here is not merely recalling the past, but bringing the death of Christ into the present, making it a real and experiential spiritual reality.

Conclusion

In the original language, the Lord’s Supper contains four core meanings:
Thanksgiving (εὐχαριστία) + Union (κοινωνία) + Banquet (δεῖπνον) + Remembrance (ἀνάμνησις).

The term “Holy Communion” used in the church today is derived from both the action and its meaning; it is not a direct biblical term. If one were to choose a more precise biblical expression, the phrase κυριακὸν δεῖπνον (kyriakon deipnon, “the Lord’s banquet”) in (1 Corinthians 11:20) would be the most accurate.


The Meaning of the Lord’s Supper

1. Remembering Christ

(Luke 22:19) “And He took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying: This is My body given for you; do this in remembrance of Me.”

(1 Corinthians 11:24–25) “And when He had given thanks, He broke it and said: This is My body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of Me. In the same way, after supper He took the cup, saying: This cup is the new covenant in My blood; whenever you drink it, do this in remembrance of Me.”

Meaning:
The word “remembrance” (ἀνάμνησις) does not merely point to the death of Christ, but to His entire person and the whole of His work.

When the Lord says “remember Me,” it is not about recalling a single moment, but about remembering:
His identity, His teaching, His obedience, His path, and everything He has accomplished.

Therefore, remembrance in the Lord’s Supper is to bring the whole person of Christ into the present, so that believers are realigned with Him through participation, rather than merely recalling a past event. This corresponds with the Lord’s call to His disciples: “Whoever wants to follow Me must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow Me” (Matthew 16:24), showing that remembrance is not only a mental reflection, but a life of following and alignment.

2. Proclaiming the Lord’s Death

(1 Corinthians 11:26) “For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes.”

[Proclaim] Original: καταγγέλλω (katangellō); Root: ἀγγέλλω (angellō “to announce, to declare”); Basic meaning: “to proclaim, to declare.”

Meaning: The Lord’s Supper is not only remembrance, but also proclamation.

The word “proclaim” (καταγγέλλω, katangellō) means to publicly declare. Therefore, every time the bread is eaten and the cup is drunk, it is not only an inward remembrance, but also an outward testimony:
A declaration that Christ’s death has taken place and carries the purpose of the gospel.

This shows that the Lord’s Supper is not a silent ritual, but an act of witness.

At the same time, the phrase “until He comes” gives it a clear time dimension: it looks back to the accomplished death of Christ, while also calling the church to continue observing it until His return.

3. Receiving the Life of the Lord

(John 6:53–57) “Jesus said: Truly, truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day. For My flesh is true food and My blood is true drink. Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood remains in Me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent Me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on Me will live because of Me.”

(1 Corinthians 10:16) “Is not the cup of blessing that we bless a participation in the blood of Christ? And is not the bread that we break a participation in the body of Christ?”

Meaning: The Lord’s Supper is not only remembrance and proclamation, but also involves receiving life.

The “eating” and “drinking” here do not refer to physical consumption, but to spiritual reception, showing that through participation, believers enter into a real spiritual relationship and effect with the life of Christ by faith.

The Scripture emphasizes:
“The one who eats… will live because of Me,” which echoes the promise of the tree of life.

(Genesis 2:9) “The Lord God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground… including the tree of life in the middle of the garden…”

(Revelation 2:7) “To the one who is victorious, I will give the right to eat from the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God.”

Explanation:

⚠️ The Lord’s Supper not only expresses faith, but involves life, and must not be treated casually:
Because it is not merely symbolic, but points to the life supply that comes from Christ.

4. The Unity of the Church — Spiritual Fellowship

(1 Corinthians 10:16–17) “Is not the cup of blessing that we bless a participation in the blood of Christ? And is not the bread that we break a participation in the body of Christ? Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread.”

Meaning: The “participation” (κοινωνία) in the Lord’s Supper not only points to union with Christ, but directly to the unity of the church.

The focus of the passage is not “I partake,” but “we partake.”

It does not emphasize individual spiritual experience, but that many, sharing one bread and one cup, become one body.

The logic is clear: because we partake of one bread → therefore we are one body.

Conclusion:
One essential nature of the Lord’s Supper is to manifest the unity of the church, not to emphasize individual spirituality.

The “participation” in the Lord’s Supper is not fundamentally individual, but corporate—it is the actual expression of the church as one body.

5. Union with Christ

(John 6:56) “Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood remains in Me, and I in them.

Meaning:
The Lord’s Supper not only allows one to receive life, but also brings forth the reality of union.

The word “remains” (μένω, menō) emphasizes a continuous state, not a temporary experience.

“To be in Me, and I in them” shows that this union is mutual:
Believers are in Christ, and Christ is in believers.

This corresponds with “participation” (κοινωνία), showing that the Lord’s Supper is not merely an outward symbolic act, but points to a real spiritual union, bringing believers into an ongoing and inward relationship with Christ.

Conclusion:
The Lord’s Supper not only imparts life, but also expresses and sustains a continuous and real spiritual union between believers and Christ.

6. The Lord’s Own Table

(1 Corinthians 11:20) “When you come together, it is not the Lord’s Supper you eat.”

(1 Corinthians 11:27–29) “So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. Everyone ought to examine themselves before they eat of the bread and drink from the cup. For those who eat and drink without discerning the body eat and drink judgment on themselves.”

Meaning:
The Lord’s Supper is called “the Lord’s Supper,” and the emphasis is not on form, but on ownership.

The word “Lord’s” (κυριακόν) indicates:
⚠️ This is not man’s table, but entirely belongs to the Lord.

Therefore, it must never be carried out according to human will,
nor can people participate however they wish.

The Scripture clearly states:
“To eat… in an unworthy manner… is to sin against the body and blood of the Lord.”

This shows that the issue is not whether one participates, but how one participates.

Thus, the Lord’s Supper is not about indifference to what is eaten,
but emphasizes that it must be observed according to the Lord’s way and in the proper condition.

It is an act that requires discernment, self-examination, and reverence.

Conclusion:
The Lord’s Supper is the Lord’s table, and must be approached carefully under His authority, not treated casually according to human desire.

7. A Response of Thanksgiving

(Luke 22:19) “And He took bread and gave thanks…”

Meaning:
The Lord’s Supper begins with “giving thanks” (εὐχαριστέω), showing that the entire act starts with gratitude, not with eating.

This reveals:
The Lord’s Supper is not merely an outward act, but an inward response.

Without thanksgiving, one cannot truly understand Christ’s sacrifice.

Because thanksgiving itself is the acknowledgment of salvation;
without it, it shows that one has not truly seen the grace of the cross.

(Isaiah 53:4–6) “Surely He took up our pain… by His wounds we are healed.”
(Psalm 22:12–16) “Many bulls surround Me… they pierce My hands and My feet.”
(Luke 9:58) “Foxes have dens and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay His head.”
(Romans 4:25) “He was delivered over to death for our sins and was raised to life for our justification.”
(2 Corinthians 8:9) “Though He was rich, yet for your sake He became poor…”
(Matthew 27:18–50) “…they crucified Him… and Jesus cried out again with a loud voice and gave up His spirit.”

Therefore, when one participates without a heart of thanksgiving:
Not only will one fail to enter the true meaning of the Lord’s Supper,
but the heart may become hardened, even indifferent to Christ’s sacrifice.

In other words:

Without thanksgiving, there is no true Lord’s Supper;
without thanksgiving, one cannot enter into the reality of salvation;
without thanksgiving, the true value of receiving life cannot be realized.


Christ Is the Passover Lamb

Introduction
Understanding the relationship between Christ and the Passover is the most fundamental and crucial theological foundation for understanding the Lord’s Supper. The Lord’s Supper is not an independent ritual; it is the fulfillment built upon the Passover. Without recognizing this, one may easily treat the Lord’s Supper as a continuation or replacement, while missing its true nature as the transition from shadow into reality.

The Scripture clearly reveals this relationship:

(1 Corinthians 5:7) “…For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.”

⚠️ This verse is not merely a comparison, but a declaration:
The Old Testament Passover has been realized, fulfilled, and completed in Christ.

➡️ Therefore, the key is not just “correspondence,” but this:
Everything prescribed in the Old Testament reaches its true purpose in Christ.

The Lord Himself also made this clear:

(Matthew 5:17) “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.”

➡️ This shows that the New Testament does not lower the standard, nor simplify the requirement, but brings what was foreshadowed in the Old Testament into full reality and completion.

In the Old Testament, the observance of the Passover was extremely precise—from the selection of the lamb, to the timing of its slaughter, to the application of the blood and the manner of eating—everything had to be carried out exactly according to God’s command.

This reveals a principle:
What belongs to God’s redemption is never something man can handle casually. Yet the Old Testament is only a shadow, while the reality is in Christ. When Christ has fulfilled all things, what people face is no longer the shadow, but the reality itself. (Colossians 2:17) “These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ.”

Therefore, the logic is absolutely not: that the New Testament allows greater looseness. Rather: since we have entered into the reality, it must not be treated lightly. The Lord’s Supper must be understood within this structure of fulfillment:

⚠️ It is not a weakening of the Old Testament, but its realization; not a reduction of requirement, but an entrance into a deeper and more real dimension.

The Practice and Attitude of the Old Testament Passover

Item Method (Old Testament Requirement) Revealed Attitude
Selection of the lamb Must be without defect, a one-year-old male lamb (Exodus 12:5) Purity in offering; not casual, must be the best
Time requirement Slaughtered at twilight on the fourteenth day of the first month (Exodus 12:6) Obedience to God’s appointed time; not to be altered
Application of blood Blood applied to the doorposts and lintel (Exodus 12:7) Salvation must be applied in God’s way; cannot be omitted
Manner of eating Roasted with fire; not eaten raw or boiled (Exodus 12:8–9) Complete obedience to God’s instruction; no personal adjustment
Accompanying food Eaten with unleavened bread and bitter herbs (Exodus 12:8) Remembrance of sin and suffering; a serious attitude
State of eating Belt fastened, sandals on feet, staff in hand (Exodus 12:11) Readiness to respond to God’s action; alertness
Time limit Must be eaten that night; nothing left until morning (Exodus 12:10) No delay, no neglect; complete obedience
Purity requirement Remove all leaven for seven days (Exodus 12:15) Separation from sin; no mixture allowed
Eligibility The uncircumcised may not eat (Exodus 12:48) Must be within the covenant; not open participation
Execution principle “You shall observe this as a lasting ordinance” (Exodus 12:24) Overall attitude: reverence, obedience, precision

Conclusion:

Every detail of the Passover demonstrates that salvation must be received according to God’s appointed way, and man cannot participate in it casually.


How to Administer the Lord’s Supper

1. Frequency and Timing

It must be continually observed until the Lord returns.

Key Scripture: (1 Corinthians 11:26) “…For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes.”

“Until He comes” clearly indicates that the Lord’s Supper is not a temporary practice, but a continual observance throughout the entire church age. This is not optional, but an action instituted by the Lord that must be faithfully maintained. As long as the church remains on earth, the Lord’s Supper must not cease; it itself is one of the signs of the church’s existence within redemption.

Therefore, the issue is not whether to observe it, but whether it is faithfully maintained until the Lord returns.

No restriction on specific days or times

Regarding days:
Unlike the Old Testament Passover, the Lord’s Supper in the New Testament is fulfilled and can be observed on any day or occasion.

Key Scriptures:
(Galatians 4:10–11) “You observe special days and months and seasons and years! I fear for you, that somehow I have wasted my efforts on you.”
(Colossians 2:16–17) “Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ.”

The apostolic warning against observing “days and months and seasons and years” points to a deviation: turning spiritual matters into external time-based systems. Therefore, the Lord’s Supper must not be institutionalized into a fixed calendar date. Its foundation is not in time, but in the completed redemption of Christ.

However, observing the Lord’s Supper during Passover is not wrong, since it carries typological significance in relation to fulfillment. The key point is that it must not be restricted to Passover only, otherwise it returns to a time-based system.

Regarding time:
The Scripture does not specify a fixed time of day. Even though it is translated as “supper” (1 Corinthians 11:20), this is not the emphasis of the original text, but a cultural interpretation.

It is also worth noting that the Lord’s suffering took place during the day; therefore, the time of observance need not be limited to evening or daytime.

Conclusion:

Since the Lord’s Supper is “in remembrance of the Lord” and for fellowship with Him, it should not be restricted in frequency, but continued until His return.

2. The Elements of the Lord’s Supper

Use unleavened bread:

In the Old Testament, the Passover required no leaven.
(Leviticus 23:4–6) “These are the appointed festivals of the Lord… On the fourteenth day of the first month at twilight the Lord’s Passover begins. On the fifteenth day… the Festival of Unleavened Bread… for seven days you must eat bread made without yeast.”
(Exodus 34:25) “Do not offer the blood of My sacrifice with anything containing yeast.”

Likewise, the bread used by the Lord in the Supper was unleavened:
(1 Corinthians 5:6–8) “…Don’t you know that a little yeast leavens the whole batch? Get rid of the old yeast… For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Therefore let us keep the festival… with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.”

[Unleavened] In the original text, there is no explicit word for “bread” (ἄρτος), but rather “unleavened things” (ἀζύμοις). This term is general, referring to anything without leaven, and by contrast includes all leavened elements—not only physically, but also symbolically representing sin and corruption.

Use only one bread:

The bread symbolizes the body of the Lord.
(1 Corinthians 11:24) “This is My body, which is for you…”
(Luke 22:19) “This is My body given for you…”

The body of the Lord is one.
(Ephesians 4:4) “There is one body and one Spirit…”

Key Scripture: (1 Corinthians 10:16–17) “…Is not the bread that we break a participation in the body of Christ? Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body…”

In the original text, both “one bread” and “one body” are clearly singular.

Conclusion: Regardless of the number of participants, only one bread should be used, with its size adjusted according to the number of people.

Use grape juice:

Key Scriptures:

(Matthew 26:28–29) “…I will not drink from this fruit of the vine from now on until that day when I drink it new with you in My Father’s kingdom.”
(Mark 14:24–25) “…I will not drink again from the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new in the kingdom of God.”

[Grape juice] Original: γενήματος τῆς ἀμπέλου (genēmatos tēs ampelou); Basic meaning: “that which is produced from the vine.”

⚠️ The original text emphasizes what is naturally produced, highlighting its origin from growth, not from processed transformation.
❌ The word “wine” does not appear in the original text; translating it directly as “wine” is interpretive, not textual.

No mixture:

The grape juice in the Supper is set apart in spiritual meaning as the blood of Christ, and therefore must not be mixed.

(Matthew 26:27–28) “…This is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.”

Blood represents life and must be treated with seriousness:

(Leviticus 17:11) “For the life of a creature is in the blood…”

If even animal blood carries such spiritual significance and must be treated carefully, how much more should the blood of Christ be received with reverence and purity?

It must be without blemish or impurity:

Wine, being fermented, cannot represent the sinless blood of Christ. Likewise, using other substances or mixing additional elements is inappropriate.

Key Scriptures:
(1 Peter 1:18–19) “…with the precious blood of Christ, a lamb without blemish or defect.
(Malachi 1:7) “You offer defiled food on My altar. But you ask, ‘How have we defiled You?’ By saying that the table of the Lord is contemptible.”

3. The Place of the Lord’s Supper

It should be received together in one place.

When partaking, there must be reverence and order. Participants should wait for one another; there must be no confusion or disorder, nor should it be taken outside the gathering, but received together in one place.

(1 Corinthians 11:33) “So then, my brothers and sisters, when you gather to eat, you should all eat together.”

This principle is consistent with the Old Testament: all wait together, receive together, and complete it together in one place.

(Exodus 12:46) “It must be eaten inside the house; take none of the meat outside the house…”


Preparation Before Taking the Lord’s Supper

1. It must be conducted in the name of the Lord Jesus

(Colossians 3:17) “And whatever you do, whether in word or deed, do it all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through Him.”

Explanation: The Lord’s Supper is not an ordinary gathering, but an act that belongs to the Lord. Therefore, it must be carried out in His name, indicating that both authority and ownership are in Christ.

2. It must declare why the Lord’s Supper is observed — to proclaim Christ’s death

(1 Corinthians 11:26) “For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes.”

Explanation:
The Lord’s Supper is not a silent ritual, but a public declaration,
bearing witness that Christ has died for humanity and that this salvation remains effective.

3. Prayer must be led so that participants understand it is the Lord’s body and blood, and approach with reverence

(1 Corinthians 11:28–29) “Everyone ought to examine themselves before they eat of the bread and drink from the cup. For those who eat and drink without discerning the body of Christ eat and drink judgment on themselves.”

Explanation:
Before the Lord’s Supper, there must be prayer and guidance so that participants enter into discernment and self-examination.
It is not to be entered into casually, but with clear understanding.

4. It must be done with thanksgiving

(Luke 22:19) “And He took bread, gave thanks and broke it…”

Explanation:
The Lord’s Supper begins with thanksgiving (εὐχαριστέω), showing that the entire act must be carried out in gratitude.
Without thanksgiving, one cannot enter into its true meaning.

5. The congregation must be informed beforehand to prepare themselves in holiness and examine whether they partake worthily

Key Scripture: (1 Corinthians 11:28) “Everyone ought to examine themselves before they eat of the bread and drink from the cup.”

Explanation:
The Lord’s Supper is not a spontaneous act, but a spiritual action that requires preparation.
Therefore, the congregation should examine themselves before God,
so as to participate in a proper state, and not casually, lest blessing turn into judgment.

(1 Corinthians 11:27–29) “So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty… they eat and drink judgment on themselves.”

Content of Self-Examination:

a. ❌ Those who are not baptized must not partake

(Acts 2:41–42) “Those who accepted his message were baptized… and devoted themselves to… the breaking of bread…”

Explanation:
The New Testament order is: baptism first, then participation in church life and the breaking of bread. This shows that partaking in the Lord’s Supper must be within a relationship of belonging to the Lord, not from outside. Furthermore, what is received in the Supper is the Lord’s body, which is holy; therefore, those who partake must also be set apart and cleansed.

This principle is clearly shown in the Old Testament:

(Exodus 12:48) “…no uncircumcised male may eat it.”
(Exodus 12:43) “…no foreigner may eat it.”
(Leviticus 22:3) “…anyone who approaches sacred offerings while unclean must be cut off…”
(Ezra 2:62–63) “…they were excluded as unclean… and could not eat the most holy things…”

These passages show:
Only those who are within the covenant and in a state of purity may partake of what is holy.

Therefore, in the New Testament:
Baptism is not merely an outward step, but a sign of entering into a relationship with the Lord and a state of cleansing.

Conclusion:
The Lord’s body is holy; therefore, those who partake must belong to Him and be cleansed. Those not in this relationship or state must not partake casually.

b. ❌ Believers in a state of sin leading to death must not partake

(1 John 5:16–17) “…there is a sin that leads to death…”
(1 Corinthians 11:27–30) “…whoever eats… in an unworthy manner… eats and drinks judgment… many among you are weak and sick, and a number have fallen asleep.”

Explanation:
Scripture distinguishes between “sin that leads to death” and “sin that does not lead to death.” This indicates a condition of sin that results in judgment and death. This is not a single act, but a persistent, willful state of sin without repentance, even treating God’s holy things lightly.

1 Corinthians 11 provides a direct example: those who partook without discernment brought weakness, sickness, and even death.

⚠️ This shows that partaking in a serious sinful state does not bring blessing, but judgment. One must examine oneself before God and partake according to conscience.

Conclusion:
Those in a serious state of sin must not partake until they have dealt with it and repented before God.

c. ❌ If it is not conducted according to God’s appointed way, one should not partake

(1 Corinthians 11:23) “For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you…”

Explanation:
The Lord’s Supper must be conducted according to what the Lord established and what the apostles passed on. If it deviates from God’s principles, even participation becomes invalid and results in “eating and drinking judgment.”

d. 💡 Summary

The Lord’s Supper must be approached with preparation and self-examination. Anyone not in the proper relationship, proper condition, or proper manner should not partake casually.


Handling the Remaining Elements of the Lord’s Supper

The remaining elements of the Lord’s Supper must not be handled casually. Once they have been set apart in the name of the Lord, they are considered holy and must be treated according to holy principles. The Old Testament already provides a pattern: they must not be left until the next morning.

(Exodus 12:10) “Do not leave any of it till morning; if some is left till morning, you must burn it.”

Reason 1: The Lord’s body and blood are holy and must not be allowed to decay or be treated carelessly.

(Psalm 16:10) “Because You will not abandon me to the realm of the dead, nor will You let Your Holy One see decay.”

Reason 2: The Lord’s body and blood are holy and must not be discarded or treated lightly.

(Hebrews 10:29) “How much more severely do you think someone deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified them, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace?”


The Attitude After Receiving the Lord’s Supper

1. To be determined to live for the Lord, because He loved us and gave Himself for us

(2 Corinthians 5:14–15) “For Christ’s love compels us… that those who live should no longer live for themselves but for Him who died for them and was raised again.”
(Romans 14:7–8) “For none of us lives for ourselves alone… If we live, we live for the Lord; and if we die, we die for the Lord…”

Explanation:
The Lord’s Supper is not only remembrance and receiving, but also brings forth a response in life.

Since the Lord has given Himself for us, we have also died and been buried with Him (Romans 6:3–4). Therefore, believers no longer belong to themselves, but to the Lord.

(Romans 6:3–4) “All of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death… so that… we too may live a new life.”

Therefore, after receiving the Lord’s Supper, one should not return to a self-centered life, but be determined to live for the Lord, responding to His love and redemption in daily life.

Summary:
➡️ Since the Lord gave Himself for us, we should no longer live for ourselves, but for Him.

2. To live a holy life, as after the Passover comes the Feast of Unleavened Bread

(1 Corinthians 5:6–8) “…Don’t you know that a little yeast leavens the whole batch… Therefore let us keep the festival… with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.”
(Exodus 12:15) “For seven days you are to eat bread made without yeast…”

Explanation:
After the Passover comes the Feast of Unleavened Bread, showing that after receiving redemption, one must enter into a life of removing leaven.

The New Testament applies this directly to believers: since Christ is our Passover Lamb, believers must remove the old leaven and live a life set apart.

Therefore, after the Lord’s Supper, one does not return to the old state, but enters into a life of continually dealing with sin and turning away from corruption, living out a holiness that matches what has been received.

Summary:
➡️ After receiving the Lord’s Supper, believers must remove sin and corruption, and live a holy life.

3. To love one another and pursue unity, being united not only with the Lord but also with fellow believers, since we partake of one bread

(1 Corinthians 10:17) “Though we are many, we are one bread and one body, for we all partake of the one bread.”
(1 Corinthians 12:12–13) “…just as a body… has many parts… so it is with Christ… we were all baptized by one Spirit so as to form one body…”

Explanation:
The Lord’s Supper not only shows union with the Lord, but also reveals unity among believers.

Since we partake of one bread, we become one body—this is not symbolic, but a spiritual reality.

Therefore, after receiving the Lord’s Supper, believers must not be divided or separated from one another, but should love one another and pursue unity in the Lord, living out the reality of one body.

Summary:
➡️ Since we partake of one bread, we must be one body and pursue true unity in love.

4. To look forward to the Lord’s return, the resurrection at the last day, and returning to the heavenly home

(1 Corinthians 11:26) “…you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes.”
(John 6:54) “Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day.”
(Revelation 19:7–9) “…the wedding of the Lamb has come… Blessed are those who are invited to the wedding supper of the Lamb…”

Explanation:
The Lord’s Supper not only looks back to Christ’s death, but also points forward to His return.

“Until He comes” shows that believers live in hope—not remaining in the past, but waiting for His appearing.

At the same time, the Lord promises resurrection at the last day and reveals the final entrance into the wedding feast of the Lamb.

Therefore, after receiving the Lord’s Supper, believers should live with hope, waiting for the Lord’s return, and preparing themselves for eternal destiny.

Summary:
➡️ The Lord’s Supper places believers in hope, waiting for the Lord’s return and preparing for eternal glory.

Ocenn2026/4/24

圣餐

为何要办圣餐

引言

为何要办圣餐?这个问题并不是出于人的需要,而是出于神的启示与吩咐。

圣餐的设立,并非教会历史中的发展产物,而是基督亲自所设立的行动。祂在被卖的那一夜,明确对门徒说:“你们应当如此行,为的是记念我”(路加福音22:19;哥林多前书11:23-25)。这不是建议,而是命令,表明圣餐是神所要求教会必须持续实行的属灵行动。

然而,圣餐的意义不止于此。若只从新约角度理解,就容易忽略其更深的根基。圣经清楚指出:“我们逾越节的羔羊基督已经被杀献祭了”(哥林多前书5:7),说明基督的工作正是旧约逾越节的成全。

因此,圣餐并不是一个孤立的礼仪,而是承接旧约、进入新约的关键行动。旧约中的逾越节,以羊羔的血使人免于审判;新约中,基督成为真正的羔羊,完成救赎,而圣餐正是使信徒进入这成全之中的实际。

这就显明一个重要原则:
圣餐不仅是记念的行动,更是救赎历史从预表进入实体的关键表达。

总结

圣餐是基督亲自设立的命令,也是逾越节在祂里面的成全,是信徒进入救赎实际的重要行动。

关键经文:

(路加福音22:19-20)“又拿起饼来,祝谢了,就擘开,递给他们,说:‘这是我的身体,为你们舍的,你们也应当如此行,为的是记念我。’饭后,也照样拿起杯来,说:‘这杯是用我的血所立的新约,是为你们流出来的。’”

(哥林多前书11:23-25)“我当日传给你们的,原是从主领受的,就是主耶稣被卖的那一夜,拿起饼来,祝谢了,就擘开,说:‘这是我的身体,为你们舍的,你们应当如此行,为的是记念我。’饭后,也照样拿起杯来,说:‘这杯是用我的血所立的新约,你们每逢喝的时候,要如此行,为的是记念我。’”

(哥林多前书5:7)“你们既是无酵的面,应当把旧酵除净,好使你们成为新团;因为我们逾越节的羔羊基督已经被杀献祭了。”

圣餐原文意义

⚠️新约中没有一个专门表示“圣餐”的单一词汇;“圣餐”这一概念,是由多个不同语境中的词汇共同表达。“圣餐”是后期教会整理神学时使用的综合性称呼,并不是新约原文直接使用的术语。

“圣餐”名称的来源(传统教会用语)

教会历史中,“圣餐”常用两个主要称呼:

一、εὐχαριστία(eucharistia)

这是“圣餐”最常见的名称之一,意思是“感谢、感恩”。
出自动词 εὐχαριστέω(eucharisteō),意思是“献上感谢”。

经文依据:主在设立圣餐时“祝谢了”(路加福音22:19)“又拿起饼来,祝谢了,就擘开,递给他们,说:这是我的身体,为你们舍的,你们也应当如此行,为的是记念我。”

【祝谢】原文:εὐχαριστήσας(eucharistēsas);字根:εὐ(eu「良好」)+χάρις(charis「恩典」);基本含义:「献上感谢、表示感恩」。

二、κοινωνία(koinōnia)

意思是“相交、共享、联合”。

经文依据:(哥林多前书10:16)“我们所祝福的杯,岂不是同领基督的血吗?我们所擘开的饼,岂不是同领基督的身体吗?”

【同领】原文:κοινωνία(koinōnia);字根:κοινός(koinos「共同、共有」);基本含义:「共享、参与、相交」。

三、δεῖπνον(deipnon,筵席)

经文依据:(哥林多前书11:20)“你们聚会的时候,算不得吃主的晚餐。”

原文重点:圣餐被称为“主的晚餐”,说明它本质上是一个属灵筵席,强调与主同在的关系。

⚠️需要注意的是:

【晚餐】原文:δεῖπνον(deipnon);字根:δειπ-(deip-「进食、用餐」);基本含义:「筵席」。

  • 在希腊文化中,δεῖπνον(deipnon)指的是一天中最重要的一餐,具有社交与团契的性质。这个词本身并不强调“时间=晚上”,而是强调“主餐”或“主要的一餐”;因此,“晚上”这一理解属于人的增译,并非原文本身的意思
  • 为何常被翻译为“晚餐”:在古代希腊与犹太文化中:“主要的一餐”通常是在一天工作结束之后进行。
  • 关键总结:δεῖπνον强调的是“主餐与筵席的性质”,而不是“晚上这个时间”,“晚餐”的翻译是基于当时文化习惯,而非词义限制。

四、ἀνάμνησις(anamnesis,记念)

经文依据:

(路加福音22:19)“又拿起饼来,祝谢了,就擘开,递给他们,说:这是我的身体,为你们舍的,你们也应当如此行,为的是记念我。”

(哥林多前书11:24-25)“祝谢了,就擘开,说:这是我的身体,为你们舍的,你们应当如此行,为的是记念我。饭后,也照样拿起杯来,说:这杯是用我的血所立的新约,你们每逢喝的时候,要如此行,为的是记念我。”

原文重点:这里的“记念”不是单纯回忆,而是将基督的死带入当下,使其成为现实性的属灵经历。

结论

圣餐在原文中包含四个核心意义:
感谢(εὐχαριστία)+联合(κοινωνία)+筵席(δεῖπνον)+记念(ἀνάμνησις)。

目前教会所使用的“Holy Communion”这一名称,是从“动作”和“意义”中提炼出来的,并不是圣经直接提供的词汇。若要更严谨地在圣经词汇里选用一个合适的表达,应以(哥林多前书11:20)中的原文 κυριακὸν δεῖπνον(kyriakon deipnon,主的筵席 The Lord’s Banquet ) 为最为贴切。


圣餐的意义

一、记念基督

(路加福音22:19)“又拿起饼来,祝谢了,就擘开,递给他们,说:这是我的身体,为你们舍的,你们也应当如此行,为的是记念我。”

(哥林多前书11:24-25)“祝谢了,就擘开,说:这是我的身体,为你们舍的,你们应当如此行,为的是记念我。饭后,也照样拿起杯来,说:这杯是用我的血所立的新约,你们每逢喝的时候,要如此行,为的是记念我。”

意义:
这里的“记念”(ἀνάμνησις)并不是单单指向基督的死,而是指向“祂整个位格与一生的作为”。

主说“记念我”,不是只记念某一个时刻,而是:
记念祂的身份、祂的教导、祂的顺服、祂的道路,以及祂所完成的一切工作。

因此,圣餐中的记念,是将基督整个位格带入当下,使信徒在参与中重新对齐于祂,而不是停留在对过去事件的回忆。这正呼应主对门徒的呼召:“若有人要跟从我,就当舍己,背起他的十字架来跟从我”(马太福音16:24),表明记念不仅是思想上的回顾,更是生命上的跟随与对齐。

二、宣告主的死

(哥林多前书11:26)“你们每逢吃这饼,喝这杯,是表明主的死,直等到他来。”

【表明】原文:καταγγέλλω(katangellō);字根:ἀγγέλλω(angellō「宣告、传报」);基本含义:「宣告、传扬」。

意义:圣餐不仅是“记念”,也是“宣告”。

  • 这里的“表明”(原文 καταγγέλλω, katangellō),意思是公开宣扬、宣告。因此,每一次吃饼、喝杯,不只是个人内在的纪念,也是外在的见证:
    向人宣告基督的死已经发生,并且具有福音目的。
  • 这也说明:圣餐不是沉默的仪式,而是带有见证性质的行动。
  • 同时,经文指出“直等到他来”,表明圣餐具有明确的时间指向:一方面回溯基督已经成就的死,另一方面也要求教会持续实行圣餐,直到基督将来再来。

三、领受主的生命

(约翰福音6:53-57)“耶稣说:我实实在在地告诉你们,你们若不吃人子的肉,不喝人子的血,就没有生命在你们里面吃我肉、喝我血的人就有永生,在末日我要叫他复活。我的肉真是可吃的,我的血真是可喝的。吃我肉、喝我血的人常在我里面,我也常在他里面。永活的父怎样差我来,我又因父活着;照样,吃我肉的人也要因我活着。”

(哥林多前书10:16)“我们所祝福的杯,岂不是同领基督的血吗?我们所擘开的饼,岂不是同领基督的身体吗?”

意义:圣餐不仅是记念与宣告,也包含领受“生命目的”的层面。

这里的“吃”与“喝”,并非指物质层面的摄取,而是属灵上的领受,表明信徒借着参与,以信心与基督的生命发生真实的属灵关系与果效。

经文强调:
吃我肉、喝我血的人…因我活着”,这与生命树的应许相呼应。

(创世记2:9)“主神使各样的树从地里长出来,可以悦人的眼目,其上的果子好作食物;园子当中又有生命树和分别善恶的树。”

(启示录2:7)“圣灵向众教会所说的话,凡有耳的,就应当听。得胜的,我必将神乐园中生命树的果子赐给他吃。”

说明:

⚠️圣餐不仅表达信仰,也涉及生命,段不可随意处理:
因为不是单纯象征,而是指向从基督而来的生命供应。

四、教会的合一—属灵的团契

(哥林多前书10:16-17)“我们所祝福的杯,岂不是同领基督的血吗?我们所擘开的饼,岂不是同领基督的身体吗?我们虽多,仍是一个饼,一个身体,因为我们都是分受这一个饼。”

意义:圣餐中的“同领”(κοινωνία)不仅指向人与基督的联合,更直接指向教会整体的合一。

经文的重点不是“我领受”,而是:“我们同领”

不是强调个人属灵经历,而是强调:多人在同一饼、同一杯中,成为一个身体。

这里的逻辑非常清楚:因为分受一个饼 → 所以成为一个身体

结论:

因此,圣餐的本质之一,就是:显明教会的合一,而不是强化个人的属灵状态。

圣餐中的“同领”,本质上不是个人性的经历,而是群体性的联合,是教会成为一个身体的实际标志。

五、与基督联合

(约翰福音6:56)“吃我肉、喝我血的人常在我里面,我也常在他里面。”

意义:
圣餐不仅使人领受生命,更带出“联合”的实际。

这里的“常在”(μένω,menō)强调一种持续性的状态,而不是短暂的经历。

“在我里面,我也在他里面”说明这种联合是双向的:
信徒在基督里面,基督也在信徒里面。

这与“同领”(κοινωνία)相呼应,表明圣餐不是外在的象征动作,而是指向一种真实的属灵联合,使人与基督之间进入持续而内在的关系之中。

因此,圣餐所表达的,不只是领受生命,更是进入并维持与基督之间的联合状态。

总结:

圣餐不仅使人领受生命,也显明并维持信徒与基督之间持续而真实的灵里联合。

六、专属主的筵席

(哥林多前书11:20)“你们聚会的时候,算不得吃主的晚餐。”

(哥林多前书11:27-29)“所以,无论何人,不按理吃主的饼、喝主的杯,就是干犯主的身、主的血了。人应当自己省察,然后吃这饼、喝这杯。因为人吃喝,若不分辨是主的身体,就是吃喝自己的罪了。”

意义:
圣餐被称为“主的晚餐”,首先强调的不是形式,而是主权。

这里的“主的”(κυριακόν)表明:
⚠️这不是人的筵席,而是完全属于主的领域。

因此,圣餐绝不能按照人的意思随意进行,
也不是人想怎样吃就怎样吃。

经文清楚指出:
“不按理吃…就是干犯主的身体和血”

说明问题不在“是否参与”,而在“如何参与”。

所以,圣餐不是“不在乎吃什么”,
而是更强调:
必须按主所定的方式、在正确的状态中参与。

这是一个需要分辨、需要省察、需要敬畏的行动。

总结:

圣餐是属主的筵席,必须在主的主权之下谨慎参与,而不能按照人的意愿随意对待。

七、感恩的响应

(路加福音22:19)“又拿起饼来,祝谢了,就擘开……”

意义:
圣餐是以“祝谢”(εὐχαριστέω)为起点,表明整件事是从感恩开始,而不是从吃开始。

这说明:
圣餐不是一个外在动作,而是一种内在回应。

若没有感恩,人就无法真正体会基督的牺牲。

因为感恩本身,是对救恩的承认;
若缺乏感恩,就表示人没有真正看见所领受十字架的恩典。

  • (以赛亚书53: 4-6)“他诚然担当我们的忧患……因他受的刑罚,我们得平安;因他受的鞭伤,我们得医治。”
  • (诗篇22: 12-16)“有许多公牛围绕我……他们扎了我的手,我的脚。”
  • (路加福音9: 58)“狐狸有洞,天空的飞鸟有窝,只是人子没有枕头的地方。”
  • (罗马书4: 25)“耶稣被交给人,是为我们的过犯;复活,是为叫我们称义。”
  • (哥林多后书8: 9)“你们知道我们主耶稣基督的恩典:他本来富足,却为你们成了贫穷,叫你们因他的贫穷,可以成为富足。”
  • 马太福音27: 18-50)“……他们将他钉在十字架上……耶稣又大声喊叫,气就断了。”

因此,当人以没有感恩的心参与时:
不仅不能进入圣餐的真实意义,
反而会使心变得冷血,甚至对基督的牺牲无动于衷。

换句话说:

  • 没有感恩,就没有真实的圣餐;
  • 没有感恩,也无法进入救恩的实际;没有感恩,
  • 就无法产生领受生命的实际价值。

基督就是逾越节的羔羊

前言

认识基督与逾越节之间的关系,是理解圣餐最根本、也最关键的神学基础。因为圣餐并不是独立出现的礼仪,它乃是建立在逾越节之上的成全。若不明白这一点,人就容易把圣餐当作一种延续或替代,而忽略它本质上是“预表进入实体”的完成。

圣经已经清楚指出这层关系:

(哥林多前书5:7)“……因为我们逾越节的羔羊基督已经被杀献祭了。”

⚠️这节经文不是简单的对比,而是宣告:旧约的逾越节,在基督里已经被实现、被完成、被成全。

➡️因此,关键不只是“对应关系”,而是:旧约的一切规定,在基督里达到其真正目的。

主自己也明确指出这一点:

(马太福音5:17)“莫想我来要废掉律法和先知;我来不是要废掉,乃是要成全。”

➡️这说明:新约不是降低标准,也不是简化要求,而是把旧约所预表的,带入真实与完全之中。

旧约中,逾越节的执行是极其严谨的——从羊羔的选择、宰杀的时间,到血的涂抹与吃的方式,都必须完全照着神的吩咐。

这说明一个原则:
凡属于神救赎的事,从来不是人可以随意处理的。然而,旧约不过是影子,实体乃在基督里:而当基督已经成全这一切时,人面对的不再是影子,而是实体本身。(歌罗西书2:17)“这些原是后事的影儿;那形体却是基督。”

因此,逻辑绝对不是:新约可以更随意,而是:既然已经进入实体,就更不能轻忽。圣餐正是在这样的“成全结构”中被理解:

⚠️它不是对旧约的削弱,而是对旧约的实现;不是减少要求,而是进入更真实的层面。

旧约逾越节的办理方式与态度

项目

办理方法(旧约规定)

所显明的态度

羊羔的选择

必须无残疾、一岁的公羊羔(出埃及记12:5)

对献祭的纯净要求,不能随意,必须最好的

时间规定

正月十四日黄昏宰杀(出埃及记12:6)

顺服神所定的时间,不可更改

血的处理

血要涂在门框与门楣上(出埃及记12:7)

必须照神方式应用救恩,不可省略

吃的方式

用火烤,不可生吃或水煮(出埃及记12:8-9)

完全按神指示执行,不可自行调整

搭配食物

与无酵饼、苦菜同吃(出埃及记12:8)

记念罪与苦难,态度严肃

吃的状态

腰间束带、脚上穿鞋、手中拿杖(出埃及记12:11)

预备好回应神的行动,带着警醒

时间限制

当夜吃完,不可留到早晨(出埃及记12:10)

不拖延、不轻慢,完全遵行

洁净要求

七日除酵,不可有酵(出埃及记12:15)

对罪的分别与清除,不容混杂

参与资格

未受割礼的不可吃(出埃及记12:48)

必须在约中,不能随意参与

执行原则

“你们要谨守遵行”(出埃及记12:24)

整体态度:敬畏、顺服、严谨

总结:

逾越节的每一个细节都显明:救恩必须按神所定的方式领受,人不能随意参与。


如何办理圣餐

一、次数与时间

  1. 要一直坚持不断办理圣餐直到主再来
    • 关键经文:(哥林多前书11:26)“……你们每逢吃这饼,喝这杯,是表明主的死,直等到他来。”
    • “直等到他来”明确指出,圣餐不是阶段性的行为,而是贯穿整个教会时期的持续实行。这不是可有可无的安排,而是主所设立、必须不断被持守的行动。只要教会仍在地上,圣餐就不能停止;它本身就是教会存在于救赎中的记号之一。
      • 因此,问题不是“要不要办”,而是:是否忠心地一直持守,直到主再来。
  2. 不限定日子、时间
    • 关于日子:
      •  与旧约逾越节不同,新约圣餐被成全在任何日子或节期中。
      • 关键经文:
        • (加拉太书4:10-11)“你们谨守日子、月份、节期、年份,我为你们害怕,惟恐我在你们身上是枉费了工夫。”
        • (歌罗西书2:16-17)“所以,不拘在饮食上,或节期、月朔、安息日,都不可让人论断你们;这些原是后事的影儿,那形体却是基督。”
      • 使徒对“谨守日子、月份、节期、年份”的警告,正是指出一种偏差:把属灵的事,转变为外在时间制度。因此,圣餐不能被制度化为某一个特定日期,它的根基不在日历,而在基督已经成全的救赎。
      • 然而,若将圣餐安排在逾越节的时间,也并非错误,因为这在预表与成全的关系上具有对应意义;但关键在于:不能将其规定为必须只在逾越节进行,否则就再次落入以日子为本的制度之中。
    • 关于时间:
      • 圣经没有指明一个固定的“时间点”,即便看起来像是晚间(哥林多前书11:20)中文翻译为“晚餐”,但这并不是原文所要表达的重点,而是带有文化理解添加的翻译处理。
      • 值得注意的是,主的受难是在白天,故举行时间,无需拘执在晚上或白天。
  3. 结论:
    • 圣餐既然“为的是记念主”,且是要藉以与主相交,就无须限制次数,于主再临之。

二、圣餐的材料

要用无酵饼:

    • 旧约时代守逾越节不可有酵
      • (利未记23:4-6)“主的节期,就是你们到了日期要宣告为圣会的,乃是这些:正月十四日,黄昏的时候,是主的逾越节。这月十五日,是向主守的无酵节你们要吃无酵饼七日。”
      • (出埃及记34:25)“你不可将我祭物的血和有酵的饼一同献上。”
    • 同样主于圣餐时所用的饼也是无酵饼:
      • (哥林多前书5:6-8)“你们这自夸是不好的。岂不知一点面酵能使全团发起来吗?你们既是无酵的面,应当把旧酵除净,好使你们成为新团;因为我们逾越节的羔羊基督已经被杀献祭了。所以,我们守这节不可用旧酵,也不可用恶毒、邪恶的酵,只用诚实真正的无酵饼。”
        • 【无酵饼】原文没有“饼”(ἄρτος),只有“无酵之物”(ἀζύμοις)。该词为泛指,表示一切“无酵的状态或事物”,相对地,也涵盖所有“有酵的成分”,不仅限于物质层面,更包括其所象征的罪恶与败坏

只用一个饼:

  • 饼象征主的身体
    • (哥林多前书11: 24)“祝谢了,就擘开,说:‘这是我的身体,为你们舍的,你们应当如此行,为的是记念我。’”
    • (路加福音22: 19)“又拿起饼来祝谢了,就擘开,递给他们,说:‘这是我的身体,为你们舍的,你们也应当如此行,为的是记念我。’”
  • 主的身体只有一个
    • 以弗所书4: 4)“身体只有一个,圣灵只有一个,正如你们蒙召同有一个指望。”
    • 关键经文:(哥林多前书10: 16-17)“我们所祝福的杯,岂不是同领基督的血吗?我们所擘开的饼,岂不是同领基督的身体吗?我们虽多,仍是一个饼,一个身体因为我们都是分受这一个饼。
      • 原文中“一个饼”和“一个身体”都是明确的单数形式。
  • 结论:所以无论人数多少,只可用一个饼,而随人数之多少决定制饼的大小。

要用葡萄汁

关键经文:

  • (马太福音26:28-29)“因为这是我立约的血、为多人流出来、使罪得赦。但我告诉你们,从今以后,我不再喝这葡萄汁,直到我在我父的国里同你们喝新的那日子。”
  • (马可福音14:14-25)“耶稣说、这是我立约的血、为多人流出来的。我实在告诉你们,我不再喝这葡萄汁,直到我在神的国里喝新的那日子。”

【葡萄汁】原文:γενήματος τῆς ἀμπέλου(genēmatos tēs ampelou);基本含义:「葡萄树所产生之物」。

  • ⚠️原文指自然生成的产物,强调“来源于生长”,而非经过加工处理的结果。
  • ❌原文没有“酒”这个词,而是“葡萄树的出产”,任何将其直接译为“酒”的处理,都属于解释性添加,而非原文本身的表达。

不可混杂

要认识葡萄汁在圣餐仪式上,已经在属灵意义上被分别,成为基督宝血,因此不可混杂:

(马太福音26:27-28)“又拿起杯来,祝谢了,递给他们,说:‘你们都喝这个;因为这是我立约的血,为多人流出来,使罪得赦。’”

血是生命,必须严肃看待:

(利未记17:11)“因为活物的生命是在血中;我把这血赐给你们,可以在坛上为你们的生命赎罪;因血里有生命,所以能赎罪

”既然动物的血尚且被赋予属灵的意义,需要如此严谨对待,何况基督的宝血,不当以敬畏与纯正的态度领受吗?

必须无玷污无瑕疵:

萄酒是发过酵的,不能代表无罪之主的宝血;即使不是酒,若使用其他物质,或在其中掺入其他成分,同样不合宜。

  • 关键经文:
    • (彼得前书1:18-19)“知道你们得赎,脱去你们祖宗所传流虚妄的行为,不是凭着能坏的金银等物,乃是凭着基督的宝血,如同无瑕疵、无玷污的羔羊之血。”
    • (玛拉基书1:7)“你们将污秽的食物献在我的坛上,还说:‘我们在何事上污秽你呢?’因你们说:‘主的桌子是可藐视的。’”

三、圣餐的地点

要在一处同领圣餐

领受时,应当肃静敬虔,彼此等候,不可纷乱、不齐,也不可带出会堂,乃要在一处同领。

(哥林多前书11:33)“所以我弟兄们,你们聚会吃的时候,要彼此等待。”

这一原则与旧约是一致的,都是在同一处等候、同一处领受、同一处完成。

(出埃及记12:46)“应当在一个房子里吃;不可把一点肉从房子里带到外头去;羊羔的骨头一根也不可折断。”

吃圣餐前的准备

第一、要奉主耶稣的名举行

(歌罗西书3:17)“无论做什么,或说话、或行事,都要奉主耶稣的名,借着他感谢父神。”

说明:圣餐不是普通聚集,而是属主的行动,因此必须在主的名下进行,表明权柄与归属都在基督之中。

第二、要宣告为何办圣餐,见证基督之死

(哥林多前书11:26)“你们每逢吃这饼,喝这杯,是表明主的死,直等到他来。”

说明:
圣餐不是无声的仪式,而是公开的宣告,
见证基督已经为人死,并且这救恩持续有效。

第三、要带领祷告,使人清楚这是主的身体与血,并谨慎敬畏

(哥林多前书11:28-29)“人应当自己省察,然后吃这饼、喝这杯。因为人吃喝,若不分辨是主的身体,就是吃喝自己的罪了。”

说明:
在圣餐前必须有祷告与带领,使参与的人进入分辨与省察,
不是随意参与,而是在清楚认知中进入。

第四、要带着感恩祝谢

(路加福音22:19)“又拿起饼来,祝谢了,就擘开,递给他们,说:这是我的身体,为你们舍的,你们也应当如此行,为的是记念我。”

说明:
圣餐以“祝谢”为起点,表明整件事必须在感恩中进行,
若没有感恩,就无法进入其真实意义。

第五、举行圣餐要事先通知会众,预备身心圣洁,审查自己是否按理领取圣餐

关键经文:(哥林多前书11:28)“人应当自己省察,然后吃这饼、喝这杯。”

说明:
圣餐不是临时性的行为,而是需要预备的属灵行动。
因此,应当事先让会众审核自己,在神面前省察,
以合宜的状态参与,而不是随意进入,避免因祝福而取罪。

(哥林多前书11:27-29)“所以,无论何人,不按理吃主的饼、喝主的杯,就是干犯主的身、主的血了。人应当自己省察,然后吃这饼、喝这杯。因为人吃喝,若不分辨是主的身体,就是吃喝自己的罪了。”

省察内容:

1、未在受浸者不可领受

(使徒行传2:41-42)“于是领受他话的人就受了洗,那一天门徒约添了三千人,都恒心遵守使徒的教训,彼此交接、擘饼、祈祷。”

说明:
新约的次序是先受洗、后进入教会生活与擘饼,表明参与圣餐必须在归入主的关系中,而不是在外面参与。更进一步,圣餐所领受的是主的身体,而主的身体是圣的,
因此,领受的人也必须是分别为圣、被洁净的人。

这一原则在旧约中已经清楚显明:

  • (出埃及记12:48)“若有外人寄居在你们中间,愿向主守逾越节,他所有的男子务要受割礼,然后才容他前来遵守,他也就像本地人一样;但未受割礼的,都不可吃这羊羔。”
  • (出埃及记12:43)“主对摩西、亚伦说:‘逾越节的例是这样:外邦人都不可吃这羊羔。’”
  • (利未记22:3)“你要对他们说:你们世世代代的后裔,凡身上有污秽、亲近以色列人所分别为圣归给主圣物的,那人必在我面前剪除;我是主。”
  • (以斯拉记2:62-63)“这三家的人在族谱之中寻查自己的谱系,却寻不着,因此算为不洁,不准供祭司的职任。省长对他们说:‘不可吃至圣的物,直到有用乌陵和土明决疑的祭司兴起来。’”

这些经文说明:
只有在约中、并且处于洁净状态的人,才可以领受属神的圣物。

因此,在新约中:
受洗不只是一个外在步骤,而是进入属主关系与洁净状态的记号,
使人可以合宜地参与圣餐。

总结:

主的身体是圣的,因此领受的人也必须是归入主、被洁净的人;未进入此关系与状态者,不可随意领受。

2、❌犯至死之罪的信徒也不可领受

(约翰一书5:16-17)“人若看见弟兄犯了不至于死的罪,就当为他祈求,神必将生命赐给他;有至于死的罪,我不说当为这罪祈求。凡不义的事都是罪,也有不至于死的罪。”

(哥林多前书11:27-30)“所以,无论何人,不按理吃主的饼、喝主的杯,就是干犯主的身、主的血了。人应当自己省察,然后吃这饼、喝这杯。因为人吃喝,若不分辨是主的身体,就是吃喝自己的罪了。因此,在你们中间有好些软弱的与患病的,死的也不少。”

说明:
圣经明确区分“至于死的罪”与“不至于死的罪”,说明有一种罪的状态,会直接带来神的审判与死亡。“至死之罪”并非指单一行为,而是指人在明知之下,仍持续、顽固地处在罪中,不悔改,甚至轻看神所设立的圣物与救恩。

哥林多前书11章正是一个直接例证:有人在不分辨主的身体、不按理参与圣餐的情况下,结果带来软弱、疾病,甚至死亡。

⚠️这说明:在属灵严重错误的状态中参与圣餐,不是领受祝福,反而是招致审判。人必须在神面前省察自己,按着良心来领受圣餐。

因此,处在严重罪中的状态,不可参与圣餐,
必须先在神面前对付、悔改,然后才可按良心领受。

总结:

圣经承认“至死之罪”的存在,而在这种状态中参与圣餐,只会带来审判,因此必须先对付罪,再进入圣餐。

3、❌发现没有按照神托付的方式办理,也不要领受

(哥林多前书11:23) “我当日传给你们的,原是从主领受的……”

说明: 圣餐必须按着主所设立、使徒所传承的方式进行。 若偏离神所定的原则,即使参与,也不再是属主的圣餐,反而“吃喝自己的罪了”。

4、💡总结

圣餐必须在预备与省察中参与,凡不在正确关系、正确状态或正确方式中的人,都不应随意领受。

圣餐剩余之处理

圣餐的剩余不可随意处理,因为既已奉主的名分别,就属于圣的,应当按圣洁的原则妥善处理。旧约已提供处理方式:不可留至次晨。

(出埃及记12:10)“不可剩下一点留到早晨;若留到早晨,要用火烧了。”

理由一:主的血与身体是圣的,不可任其腐坏或被轻忽对待。

(诗篇16:10)“因为你必不将我的灵魂撇在阴间,也不叫你的圣者见朽坏。”

理由二:主的血与身体是圣的,不可随意丢弃或轻慢。

(希伯来书10:29)“何况人践踏神的儿子,将那使他成圣之约的血当作平常,又亵慢施恩的灵,你们想,他要受的刑罚该怎样加重呢?”

领受圣餐之后应该有的态度

1、要立志为主活,因为主爱我们,已经为我们舍命了

  • (哥林多后书5:14-15)“原来基督的爱激励我们;因我们想一人既替众人死,众人就都死了;并且他替众人死,是叫那些活着的人,不再为自己活,乃为替他们死而复活的主活。”
  • (罗马书14:7-8)“我们没有一个人为自己活,也没有一个人为自己死。我们若活着,是为主活;若死了,是为主死。所以,我们或活或死,总是主的人。”

说明:

圣餐不仅是记念与领受,也带出生命的回应。

既然主已经为我们舍命,我们也同死同埋葬(罗马书6:3-4),信徒就不再属于自己,而是属于主。

(罗马书6:3-4)“岂不知我们这受洗归入基督耶稣的人,是受洗归入他的死吗?所以,我们借着洗礼归入死,和他一同埋葬,原是叫我们一举一动有新生的样式,像基督借着父的荣耀从死里复活一样。”

因此,领受圣餐之后,不应回到以自我为中心的生活,而是当立志为主而活,在生活中回应祂的爱与救赎。

总结:

➡️既然主为我们舍命,我们就当不再为自己活,而是为主而活。

2、要过圣洁的生活,如古时守逾越节的筵席后,要守除酵节

  • (哥林多前书5:6-8)“岂不知一点面酵能使全团发起来吗?你们既是无酵的面,应当把旧酵除净,好使你们成为新团;因为我们逾越节的羔羊基督已经被杀献祭了。所以,我们守这节不可用旧酵,也不可用恶毒、邪恶的酵,只用诚实真正的无酵之物。”
  • (出埃及记12:15)“你们要吃无酵饼七日;头一日要把酵从你们各家中除去。”

说明:
逾越节之后紧接着是除酵节,表明领受救赎之后,必须进入除去酵的生活。

新约将这一原则直接应用在信徒身上:既然基督已经成为我们的逾越节羔羊,信徒就当除去旧酵,过一个分别为圣的生活。

因此,圣餐之后,不是回到原来的状态,而是进入持续对付罪、远离败坏的生活,活出与所领受相称的圣洁。

总结

➡️领受圣餐之后,信徒当励志除去罪与败坏,活出圣洁的生活。

3、要彼此相爱,追求合一,不但与主联合,也要在主里与同蒙恩者合一,因为我们都是同领一个饼

  • (哥林多前书10:17)“我们虽多,仍是一个饼,一个身体,因为我们都是分受这一个饼。”
  • (哥林多前书12:12-13)“就如身子是一个,却有许多肢体;而且肢体虽多,仍是一个身子;基督也是这样。我们不拘是犹太人,是希利尼人,是为奴的,是自主的,都从一位圣灵受洗,成了一个身体,饮于一位圣灵。”

说明:
圣餐不仅表明人与主的联合,也显明信徒之间的合一。

既然同领一个饼,就成为一个身体,这不是象征性的说法,而是属灵实际。

因此,领受圣餐之后,不可彼此分裂、彼此隔绝,反而应当彼此相爱,在主里追求合一,活出同一个身体的实际。

总结:

➡️既然同领一个饼,就当成为一个身体,在爱中追求真实的合一。

出埃及记:全书综合

【法老的3次建议】

  1. 不要走得很远(8:28)

  2. 不可都去,你们这壮年人去事奉主罢(10:11)

  3. 你们去事奉主,只是你们的羊群牛群要留下(10:24)

【出(7:1)至(13:16)十灾可分为四类:

  1. 令人厌恶不适的:

    • 变水为血(第一灾)

    • 蛙灾(第二灾)

    • 虱灾(第三灾)

  2. 令人的痛苦的:

    • 蝇灾(第四灾)

    • 畜疫(第五灾)

    • 疮灾(第六灾)

  3. 令人惧怕的:

    • 雹灾(第七灾)

    • 蝗灾(第八灾)

    • 黑暗(第九灾)

  4. 最可怕的灾害:

    • 杀长子之灾(第十灾)

  • 十灾中的前九灾不是连续发生,其间历时几达1年(从首年6月尼罗河水上涨到次年3月小麦、粗麦长成,以及4月的东风和5月的喀新风出现,参7:14;8:1621;9:18;10:12,21各注)。这些灾都是自然与生物世界的景象加剧变化,令法老左右能使用邪术、驱使鬼魔的术士,不得不承认神的指头在后作用(8:19,“指头”在《和合本》中译为“手段”);不是变魔术、耍戏法,而是创造自然与万物的主宰亲自干预。

出埃及记的预表

在本书中有摩西、亚伦,以及关于会幕中一切器具的预表,概指基督与教会这一方面。但其中有些预表,只能认为是类似的例子,作为属灵的说法,因在新约中未有明确的启示:

  1. 摩西Moses—希伯来文意“拉出”(出3:1-12)。

    • 豫表基督为拯救者。(赛61: 1,路4:18,林后1:10)有四方面:

      • A是神所拣选的。(出3:1-10,徒七 25,约3:16)。

      • B 被以色列人弃绝转向外邦(出2:11-15,徒7:29,28:17-28)。

      • C 被弃绝后从外邦人中得一新妇。(出2:16-21,太12:14-21,林后11:2)。

      • D 被二次回来拯救以色列民,并被接待。(出4:29-31,罗11:24-26,徒15:14-17)。

    • 预表基督的职分亦有四方面:

      • A 为先知(申18:15-19,徒3:22-23)。

      • B为中保(出32:31-35,约壹2:1-2)。

      • C 为代求者。(出17:1-6,来7:25)。

      • D 为君王元帅。(出3:10,申33:4-5,来2:10)。

    • 但摩西在神的家中是仆人,耶稣是神的儿子治理自己的家。(来3:5 6)。

  2. 亚伦Aaron—意“甚高”,预表基督为大祭司。(出28:1,来7:17-20、24-26)。

  3. 法老Pharoh—埃及王之称号,预表魔鬼掌权作世界之王。(出2:15,5:2,约12:31)。

  4. 羔羊Lamb—逾越节被杀的羔羊,预表救赎主基督。(出12:1-28,约1:29,林前5:6-7,彼前1:18-19)。

  5. 筵席Feast—逾越节的筵席Passover Feast,预表基督为生命的粮,应验在纪念主的晚餐上。(出12: 1-11,太26: 26-28,林前11:23-26,约6:35)。

  6. 吗哪Manna—预表基督是生命的粮,从天降下,赐生命给这世界,亦为主赐给得胜的人之恩。(出16:31,约6:32-35,48-51,启2:17)。

  7. 盘石Rock—基督是盘石,被击打预表基督之死而赐人恩典,得生命的活水。(出17:6,林前10:4,太27: 26,约4:10-14,弗2:8-9)。

  8. 会幕Tabernacle,Tent—帐幕。(出25:8-9 ,39:32)。

    • 预表新约教会是神的家,为圣灵的居所。(出25: 8 9,弗2:19-22)。

    • 预表信徒的身子是永生神的殿。(林前3:16、17,林后6:16)。

    •  预表天上之事的影像永存的真帐幕。(来8:2,9:11、23、 24,路16:9)。

  9. 约柜The Ark Of The Covenant—(出25:10-22)。

    • 用皂荚木与金子作的,预表基督的人性和神性。(出25:10、11)。

    • 内有神的法版,预表基督完全了律法,立了榜样叫人跟从。(出25:16,太5:17,罗10:4)。

    • 有盛吗哪的金罐,预表基督是自天上降下来的真粮。(出10:33、34,来9:4,约6:32 、33)。

    • 有亚伦发芽的杖,预表主的拣选。

    • 有施恩座,预表神的宝座。(出25:17)。这是一个施恩的宝座,并非审判的宝座。上面洒了赎罪的血,满足了律法的要求,借着基路伯保守了神的圣洁。(创3:24,参结1: 5,启4: 6、9,罗3:25)。

  10. 陈设饼Showbread,The Bread Of The Presence—预表基督是生命的粮,是信徒得生命之乳养者。(出25:30,约6:35)。

  11. 灯台Candie Stick Lampstand—预表基督是生命之光与圣灵,亦为新约的教会之预表。(出25:31,约1:4,8:12,徒16:7,启1:20)。

  12. 皂荚木Acacia Wood—又名什亭木Shittah,预表基督降卑为人。(出26:15,赛53: 2 ,腓2: 6、7)。

  13.  竖板Board—预表新约信徒,竖板互相连络,预表信徒肢体互相配搭成为教会。(出26:15,约17:21-23,弗2:21、22)。

  14. 内幔Veil—预表基督身体,幔子裂开,预表基督之死,开了一条又新又活的道路。(出26:31-33,太26:26,27:51、52,来10: 19、20)。

  15. 金子Gold—预表基督的神性和荣耀。(出26:29,约17:21-23,弗1:4、6)。

  16. 银子Silver—预表神的救赎。(出26:19,30:13-16,民3:44-51)。

  17. 铜 Brass—预表神的洁净,如铜坛,铜蛇。(出27:2,民21: 6-9,约3:14、15,林后5:21)。

  18. 祭坛 Altar—预表基督的十字架,基督已献上已身成为永远的赎罪祭。(出27:1、2,来9:12、14)。

  19. 蓝色 Blue—预表属天的性质,信徒当有属天属神的品性。(出25:4,约3:16)。

  20. 紫色 Purple—预表属天的王权或君尊,结服权柄的果子。(出25:4,斯8:15,约19:2)。

  21. 红色 Scarlet—预表牺牲或受苦,结舍已爱人的果子。(出25: 4,约19:34)。

  22. 白色 White—预表光明圣洁,结生活行为圣洁的果子。(出28:19,帖前2:10)。

  23. 香坛 Altar Of Incense —预表基督为人代求者,人借着祂祈祷与颂赞达于神。(出30:1,约17: 1-26,来7: 25,13:15,启8:3、4)。

  24. 圣服 Holy Garment—祭司的7圣服,是外炮、内炮、裤、冠、以弗得、胸牌、与额牌等,预表披戴基督,尊荣与圣洁。(出28: 3-43,赛61: 10,加3:27)。

  25. 洗濯盆Wash Withal—预表基督以洗脚礼洁净信徒,脱离一切的污秽。(出30:18,约13: 2-10,弗5: 25-27)。

  26. 青橄榄油Pure Oil Olive—油是圣灵的表号,预表被圣灵所膏。(出27:20,约3:34,8:12,弗1:17、18,2:18)。

  27. 膏油Anointing预表工作的圣灵,圣灵降临在信徒身上得着能力,为主作见证。(出30: 31,徒1:8,10:38)。

【32~34 约的破坏与重订】

  • 当以色列人铸造金牛之时,约于是给破坏了。但是,透过摩西的代求(32:11-13, 30-32; 33:12-17; 34:9),并部分以色列人因继续放肆而受审判,其他百姓得到一个新的机会:约因此得以重订。除了摩西的代祷之外,神同在的观念 32:34; 33:1-3, 12-16; 34:9)以及神审判与赦免的并行(32:10, 14, 34; 33:3, 9; 34:6, 14),将此三章连贯起来。

【救赎之工,有消极与积极两方面

  1.     (一)消极方面   救功之消极方面,即藉用十大灾,胜过埃及各种的邪神,与法老的权势。神今日救信徒,也是先作成这消极方面之工。

  2.     (二)积极方面   所作积极方面之工,最要者有二:

    •     1.赎——过逾越节所表明的    即藉羔羊的血救长子不死。神晓谕摩西在正月十四日“黄昏的时候,以色列全会众把羔羊宰了,各家要取点血,涂在吃羊羔的房屋左右的门框上和门楣上……这血要在你们所住的房屋上作记号,我一见这血,就越过你们去”。

    •     2.救——过红海所表明的     神领以色列人到了红海,并非走了错路,乃是要在此显出神的荣耀。一则对于敌人一方面说,是要将以色列人的仇敌,投在海里,报复他们虐待选民的罪。二则对于以色列人一方面说,乃是要他们“在海中云下受洗,归了摩西”(林前l0:l-2),不但身体经验了救恩,同时灵性也经验了救恩。

    • 按“救”、“赎”二字,原是有分别的:“赎”是逾越节的经验,“救”是过红海的经验;“赎”是脱罪刑,“救”是脱罪权;“赎”是主替我死,“救”是我经验死;“赎”是由神恩,“救”是由神能。既过逾越节,又过红海,即是完全得了救赎,永不属于埃及,且是不再下到埃及了。

【摩西一生的3个时期】

  1. 40岁以前──只知道「我能」──凭自己行事(2章)

  2. 40岁到80岁──认识了「我不能」──不敢承担神的托付(3~7章)

  3. 80岁到120岁──认识到「神能」──遵照神的话行事(8~40章)

《出埃及记》20章22节至23章19节四章的细目:

  1. 拜神之律(廿22~26)

    •  a.勿拜偶像(22~23)

    •  b.祭坛之例(24~26)

  2. 护身之律(廿一1~32)

    •  a.论待奴婢(4~11)

    •  b.偿命之罪(12~17)

      • ⑴ 故杀误杀(12~14)

      • ⑵ 击打父母(15)

      • ⑶ 拐带人口(16)

      • ⑷ 咒骂父母(17)

    •  c.忿怒之罪(18~27)

      • ⑴ 互相斗殴(18~19)

      • ⑵ 击毙奴婢(20~21)

      • ⑶ 误伤孕妇(22~25)

      • ⑷ 打伤奴婢(26~27)

    •  d.牛触人死(28~32)

  3. 护物之律(廿一33至廿二15)

    •  a.疏忽防围(33~36)

      •   ⑴ 挖井不掩(33~34)

      •   ⑵ 二牛相触(35~36)

    •  b.捉贼之例(二十二1~4)

    •  c.牧畜之例(5)

    •  d.失火之例(6)

    •  e.寄托财务(7~9)

    •  f.寄托牲畜(10~13)

    •  g.借用牲畜(14~15)

  4. 各种杂律(廿二16至廿三19)

    •  a.论及个人(廿二16~31)

      • ⑴ 诱奸处女(16~31)

      • ⑵ 巫女当杀(18)

      • ⑶ 与兽淫合(19)

      • ⑷ 祭祀别神(20)

      • ⑸ 欺压客旅(21)

      • ⑹ 虐待寡妇(22~24)

      • ⑺ 放债之例(25)

      • ⑻ 取质乏例(26~27)

      • ⑼ 毁谤官长(28)

      • ⑽ 初熟首生(29~30)

        •   ⑾ 咬死之畜(31)

    •  b.论及众人(二十三1~19)

      • ⑴ 勿作妄证(二十三1~3)

      • ⑵ 宜爱仇敌(4~5)

      • ⑶ 听讼宜公(6~8)

      • ⑷ 勿欺客旅(9)

      • ⑸ 论安息年(10~11)

      • ⑹ 论安息日(12)

      • ⑺ 勿称他神(13,诗十六4)

      • ⑻ 三次守节(14~16)

        • ① 除酵节(15)

        • ② 收割节(15)

        •  ③ 收藏节(16)

      • ⑼ 祭祀要例(17~19)

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑